Electronic trading in the fixed income markets
…Google says so here.
… it also required the most extensive tuning efforts, many of which were done at a level of sophistication that would not be available to the average programmer.
Not just faster, but also much more efficient with memory utilization but apparently not so much with binary size. The Java JAR is 1/3rd the size of the C++ opt binary, but comparing bytecode with machine code is unfair (I wonder why they don’t native compile it). Neither Java nor Scala claim to be performance-competitive with C/C++. An interesting comparison would be FORTRAN, OCaml, and C++.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.