Paul Graham on Philosophy

October 8, 2007

I’ve been a fan of Paul Graham‘s since I read “Beating the Averages” some time ago. So I was intrigued to read his thoughts on philosophy, and gratified to discover he was a philosophy undergrad himself, as I was. His essay reminded me of Freddie Ayer’s opening to Language, Truth & Logic: “The traditional pursuits of philosophers are, for the most part, as unwarranted as they are unfruitful”.

I wouldn’t take such a strong stance as Graham on the uselessness of philosophy, since I think the most basic question of metaphysics & ontology – “what kind of things are there ?” – is the same question we ask ourselves when embarking on a new design. So software design is applied ontology.

And I do like Murray Gell-Mann’s comment on philosophy: “philosopy is the discipline whose adherents kick up a load of dust, then complain they can’t see”.

I think Graham’s problem with philosophy stems from the fact that he started with it. It’s probably better to master a technical discipline, then philosophize about it – witness Taleb, Soros, Niederhoffer on markets. Or Naur on computing.


One Response to “Paul Graham on Philosophy”

  1. […] essay on “How to do Philosophy” deserves a serious response. And there have been some, here, here, and here. Like many who begin studying philosophy, he’s disappointed that he […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s