Collapsing spreads and auto quoting engines

September 12, 2006

I’m still reading chapter 14 of Harris, on bid ask spreads. As always with Harris, it’s highly enlightening and thought provoking. I commented earlier on how the dynamic equilibrium between market and limit orders affects spreads, and how eSpeed charges for market orders in order to minimise spreads. Later in ch 14 he goes on to enumerate the factors that determine the equilibrium spread in order driven markets. In decreasing order of importance they are: information asymmetry between traders, time to cancel limit orders, volatility, limit order management costs, value of trader time, difference between limit and market order fees and trader risk aversion.

All this put me in mind of how bid ask spreads have collapsed in the fixed income rates markets in recent years; by 80% in the last five years, according to some estimates. A lot of that must have been driven by the greater transparency of electronic markets: buy side clients like pension funds can see live ticking prices for euro govies on Bloomberg and TradeWeb, and initiate competitive multi-dealer auctions.

Bloomberg and TradeWeb are quote driven rather than order driven markets, so Harris’ thoughts on equilibrium spreads don’t all apply, especially the ones on limit order cancellation and management costs. For the order driven markets, like Eurex Bonds, eSpeed and MTS, I wonder how much of the collapse in spreads is due to autoquoting engines driving down the cost of limit order management.

For those not familiar, autoquoting engines can translate a stream of bid and ask prices and sizes into buy and sell orders on order driven markets. When the bid and ask change, the engine pulls and places buy and sell orders as necessary. One autoquoting engine vendor used widely by fixed income dealers is ION.

Autoquoting engines are like nuclear weapons, once invented they can’t be uninvented. Dealers may yearn for the days of voice quoting, limited transparency and wide spreads. But there’s no going back. Autoquoting engines almost totally eliminate the time to cancel limit orders, and the costs of managing those orders – apart from any fees. If we accept Harris’ arguments, the use of autoquoting engines must bear down on the equilibrium spread.

About these ads

5 Responses to “Collapsing spreads and auto quoting engines”


  1. [...] I posted on Harris’ discussion of spreads earlier. Harris goes on to summarise the main three spread determinants as asymmetric information, volatility and utilitarian trading interest. Utilitarian interest is trading by investors, hedgers and gamblers rather than market makers. Volatility can be measured, but the other two factors can’t. [...]

  2. James Says:

    My wife used to say that :p

  3. Juana Says:

    Excellent site, blessings :)

  4. Wiliam Says:

    haha great! I must show that to my friend :D

  5. John Doe Says:

    dc80f458b3ac2bcea522a4141f89d54a

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s